Jesper De Jong vs Daniel Little Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. De Jong vs D. Little

Jesper De Jong
NED
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
25
Age
28
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
-
77
C. Rank
843
77
Best Rank
564
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.1M
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Daniel Little
GBR
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
25
Age
28
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
-
77
C. Rank
843
77
Best Rank
564
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.1M
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Jong 1 - 0 Little
They have played 3 sets in total, with Jesper De Jong winning 2 and Daniel Little winning 1. The last match between Jesper De Jong and Daniel Little was at the M25 Sunderland, 25-02-2020, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Jesper De Jong getting the victory 6-7(5) 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jong | 1 |
| Little | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Sunderland(02-25-20)
Jesper De Jong
6
7
6
Daniel Little
7
5
3
J. D. Jong vs D. Little H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,079,930 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.80% (288-178) | Career Total W/L | 54.64% (100-83) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 54.84% (17-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. D. Jong vs D. Little Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jesper De Jong has won 47.02% of points on their second serve, while Daniel Little has won 44.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jesper De Jong, in recent form, has won 44.57% of their opponent's second serve points, while Daniel Little has won 46.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.57% and 30.40% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jesper De Jong has saved 60.30% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel Little has saved 42.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jesper De Jong has won 52.24% of matches played (W/L 35/32), with Daniel Little winning 0% (W/L 0/3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jesper De Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 94/47), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 6/12). Daniel Little has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/8).
- Player level: In the last year, Jesper De Jong has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 14/13), where as Daniel Little has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jesper De Jong winning 1 times and Daniel Little being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jesper De Jong winning 2 and Daniel Little winning 1.
- The last match between Jesper De Jong and Daniel Little was at the M25 Sunderland, 25-02-2020, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Jesper De Jong getting the victory 6-7(5) 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:20:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jesper De Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of 190.01 while Daniel Little has played against players with an average rank of 270.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jesper De Jong has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel Little has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jesper De Jong has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel Little has converted 46.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jesper De Jong vs Daniel Little Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. D. Jong vs D. Little H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 15 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:20:0 | Average Match Time | 2:20:0 |
| 58% (60/103) | 1st Serve % | 61% (62/101) |
| 85% (51/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (48/62) |
| 56% (24/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (20/39) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (33/101) | Return Points Win % | 27% (28/103) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Jong 51%, Little 44%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Jong 49%, Little 47%.
Break Points Saved %: Jong 58%, Little 43%.
J. D. Jong Recent Matches Played
D. Little Recent Matches Played

J. D. Jong vs D. Little Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.80% (288/178) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.64% (100/83) |
| 59.46% (641/437) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.04% (224/183) |
| 54.13% (5567/4717) | Games Win/Loss | 52.35% (2053/1869) |
| 66.67% (94/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.70% (58/50) |
| 64.45% (165/91) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 45.10% (23/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.50% (40/24) |
| 33.33% (6/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/8) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.6 |
| 2012 | Aces Total | 1144 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1225 | Total Double Faults | 318 |
| 1:41:13 | Average Match Time | 1:23:14 |
| 275.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 419.96 |
| 60% (19117/31871) | 1st Serve % | 59% (6355/10770) |
| 70% (13467/19117) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (4692/6355) |
| 51% (6492/12754) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2162/4415) |
| 42% (1419/3373) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (370/884) |
| 41% (13212/32228) | Return Points Win % | 37% (3906/10558) |
| 60.98% (25/16) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.92% (23/25) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 60.48% (127/83) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 69.08% (105/47) | Futures W/L | 55.87% (100/79) |
| 62% (274/442) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (100/183) |
| 50% (6/12) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (87/168) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (35/58) |
| 53% (74/139) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (17/41) |
| 88% (281/247) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (108/90) |
| 12% (281/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (108/18) |
| 21% (185/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (75/10) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:30 PM 05/11/25
PredictionW1
1.62
W2
2.29
03:00 PM 05/11/25
PredictionW1
1.6
W2
2.33
03:30 PM 05/11/25
PredictionW1
2.22
W2
1.57
05:00 PM 05/11/25
PredictionW1
1.38
W2
3.04
06:30 AM 05/11/25
PredictionW1
2.49
W2
1.46
06:30 AM 05/11/25
PredictionW1
2.22
W2
1.57
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
04 Nov 2025
Solana Sierra vs Miriam Bianca Bulgaru Prediction – WTA Tucuman Open – 5th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Malaika Rapolu vs Alycia Parks Prediction – WTA Austin 125 – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Mariano Navone vs Murkel Dellien Prediction – ATP Lima 3 Challenger – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Iva Jovic vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Prediction – WTA Austin 125 – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Eliot Spizzirri vs Nuno Borges Prediction – ATP Hellenic Championship – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Martina Capurro Taborda vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Tucuman Open – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
18:30
H2H 5-6
17:00
H2H 3-3
17:00
H2H 3-1
18:30
H2H 1-1
15:00
H2H 2-1
Tennis Events This Week
Hellenic Championship - Athens
Greece
Moselle Open - Metz
France
Helsinki Challenger
Finland
Knoxville Challenger
United States
Lima 3 Challenger
Peru
Matsuyama Challenger
Japan
Taipei Challenger
Chinese Taipei
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Manama
Bahrain
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Guadalajara
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Valencia
Spain